Exegesis of john 3 16

Who wrote John, when and to whom?

Exegesis of john 3 16

Historical and Literary Context. The historical context is difficult to determine, but many scholars believe the passage to be a creation of the Evangelist. Doubleday, Craig Keener, The Gospel of John: A Commentary, Vol 1, Peabody: Grammatically, the passage is divided between the dialogue of vv.

Perhaps, Jesus never told Nicodemus of the heavenly things since he did not understand the earthly things v. Exposition of John 3: God loves the world to save it 3: To understand this love requires an adequate definition of the world.

God loved the world despite that its hatred and rejection of Him would cause the death of his Son. The construction ou twj In this example, it functions adverbially, modifying the speech, and joining two clauses in purpose, rather than indicating degree or quantity of speech. In each case, the degree of the verb is 6 John P.

Good News or Bad News? Carson, Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility: Baker Books, BDAG lists this as the primary meaning of ou twj. In these last two examples, the phrase acts adverbially, indicating purpose.

Daniel Walter essential to the meaning of the sentence. The same idea is expressed passively in 3: Thus, the action of God and Christ is unified. This is the first of three sayings, often noted as the equivalents of the passion predictions in the Synoptic Gospels.

The lifting up of the serpent brought healing to all who looked at it, just as all 11 The examples are: All the examples use finite verbs usually indicative mood in the protasis, although infinitives and participles frequently appear in the apodosis.

Gundry and Howell argue against this interpretation based on philological arguments, the occurrence of the construction ou twj The examples I have cited from the Maccabees are not considered.

Exegesis of john 3 16

Additionally, they concern themselves greatly with parallel structures in John 3: Gundry and Russell W. In John, these are not simply predictive prophecies but theological interpretations.

Daniel Walter who look to Jesus with eyes of faith receive eternal life 3: Paradoxically, the lifting up of the Son of Man reveals his identity as the one whom God gave for all people 8: The third saying Word Books,John God so loved the world, that He gave His-only begotten Son.

The gospel in brief. Pliny declares that Cicero once saw the Iliad of Homer written in so small a character that it could be contained in a nutshell. In John John recapitulates in summary fashion the .

Daniel Walter God’s Gift of Love I. Introduction.!

Original Language Tools

Football enthusiasts from a generation ago recall the lone fan in the stadium proudly lifting up a handmade sign that read, “John ” That fan has since disappeared along with the public knowledge of that verse’s significance.

When Tim. I believe that John fits in many different ways. First, we know that some of the main themes of John is symbolism explained with plenty of metaphors and similes. In John 3, Jesus is using water baptism metaphor allegory. Oct 15,  · I would like to devote this thread to the exegesis of John , with the hopes that we can come to a conclusion on what the grammatical structure is and what it is/is not saying.

Exegesis of john 3 16

I hope that certain people will grow in their knowledge of the text and therefore stop posting it to prove something it. John is set within a passage that describes a nighttime visit of the Pharisee Nicodemus to Jesus ().

The historical context is difficult to determine, but many scholars believe the passage to be a creation of the Evangelist.2 That Jesus speaks in the plural (v.

11), in the third person (v. 13ff), and as if he were already ascended (v. An Exegetical Look at John - by Dr. C. Matthew McMahon Calvinistic Articles on the Christian Faith Today, many Christians are turning back to the puritans to, “walk in the old paths,” of God’s word, and to continue to proclaim old truth that glorifies Jesus Christ.

Exegetical Commentary on John 3 | regardbouddhiste.com