A comparison between the first administrations of the united states government and the administratio

This causes a significant degree of variation in funding and coverage within the country. History[ edit ] Canada and the US had similar healthcare systems in the early s, [1] but now have a different mix of funding mechanisms. Mexico established a universal healthcare program by November Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.

A comparison between the first administrations of the united states government and the administratio

Washington happily resigned his military command at the end of the Revolutionary War in He saw himself living out his days as a farmer at Mt. But he would be called on to lead the country again — this time not in war, but peace.

During the critical period of the s Washington privately feared that the weak central government dictated by the Articles of Confederation threatened the long-term health of the nation.

He supported the call for a Constitutional Convention and after some hesitation attended as a delegate where he was elected the presiding officer. He took a relatively limited role, however, in the debate that created the proposed Constitution.

Nor did he publicly favor ratification.

Your Answer

It seems that his sense of personal reserve prevented him from actively campaigning. As he was likely to become the first president, he avoided the appearance of self-serving motivation by not aggressively supporting the Constitution in public.

The significance of the first presidential administration under the Constitution is hard to overstate. The Constitution provided a bare structural outline for the federal government, but how it would actually come together was unclear. The precedent established by the first president would be enormous.

Washington generally proceeded with great caution. For the most part he continued precedents that had been established under the Articles of Confederation. For instance, he carried over the three departments of the government that had existed before the Constitution.

But the nationalist Washington favored a stronger central government and made sure that executive authority was independent from total legislative control.

For instance, Washington appointed his own head to each department of government whom the legislature could only accept or reject. Furthermore, Washington identified the three leaders Thomas Jefferson as secretary of state, Alexander Hamilton of the treasury, and Henry Knox of war as his personal "cabinet" of advisers, thus underscoring the executive's domain.

Particularly in his first term as president fromWashington's enormous personal popularity and stature enhanced the legitimacy of the modest new national government.

Unfortunately for Washington, events in his second term somewhat clouded his extraordinary success. For one, his own cabinet split apart as Thomas Jefferson increasingly dissented from the economic policies proposed by Alexander Hamilton, most of which Washington supported.

Even more disturbing to Washington was the emergence of a new form of political activity where the public divided into opposing parties. Although now a fundamental feature of modern democracy, Washington and many others perceived organized opposition to the government as treasonous! These clouds at the end of Washington's public career, like the difficulties of his first military command in the s, remind us that even this most stellar of the Founding Fathers hardly glided through public life without controversy.

As impressive and even as indispensable as Washington had been to the creation of the new nation, he remained a leader with qualities that could not appeal to all of the people all of the time. Most interestingly perhaps, is that some of the personal qualities that made him extraordinarily effective are also ones that might make him extremely unpopular today.

Washington consciously cultivated a distance from the public and a personal reserve that made him aloof. He was a curious combination of lateth century qualities — a regal republican whose disdain for democratic excess helped give life, power, and respectability to what would soon become the world's first modern democracy.Donald J.

Trump is the 45th President of the United States. He believes the United States has incredible potential and will go on to exceed anything that it has achieved in the past. As for the United States, the new Bush administration is likely to continue engaging the North but the question remains whether its approach will be tougher than that of the Clinton administration.

Comparison between the. United States, United Kingdom and Romanian. Constitutions and Legal System. gzb32byz3b. Regardless of some minor differences the fundamental law in all the three states is The Constitution. On December 23, , the United States, under the Obama Administration, abstained from United Nations Security Council Resolution , effectively allowing it to pass.

On December 28, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry strongly criticized Israel and its settlement policies in a speech. This book will provide fresh insights for anyone interested in the role of public administration in the United States today.

A comparison between the first administrations of the united states government and the administratio

Michael W. Spicer is a professor of public administration and urban affairs at the Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University. agreement between the government of the united states of america and the government of the oriental republic of uruguay on science and technology cooperation.

Foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration - Wikipedia